• Sharebar
Administration
Monday, August 17, 2015 - 02:16
Complex trail

The world is moving toward greater levels of digitisation. Organisations are increasingly implementing electronic and automated solutions in an effort to reduce paper-based processes.
“The move toward the ultimate destination of the paperless office requires organisations to embrace the final frontier – the electronic signature,” says Avi Rose, Regional Sales Manager at DocuSign.
The signatory process is one of the last barriers toward the implementation of end-to-end digital systems and, as such, is a significant contributor toward reduced organisational efficiency. However, many organisations remain concerned about the legalities of such electronic signature solutions. Understanding the legal aspects and how to select a secure service, which complies with the relevant legislation, is essential in escaping from paperbound processes and leveraging improved efficiency and cost effectiveness.
According to the Electronic Communications and Transactions (ECT) Act of 2012, an electronic signature is any data attached to or logically associated with other data, which is intended to be a signature and has a relationship with that data. This relationship can be any number of things, including a data signature residing in the same file, or data residing in a different file to which the original document points.
David Luyt, Associate at Michalsons adds, “This may seem overly complicated. However, the important aspects here are the intent, and the relationship between the document and the ‘signature’. Basically, an electronic signature is a piece of data attached to an electronically transmitted document as verification of the sender’s identity and his or her intent to sign the document.”

The legal aspects

There are various rules that regulate electronic signatures for any given transaction under South African law. These include the South African Common Law, as well as the ECT Act, and other legislation relevant to specific transaction types.
“South African Common Law has in the past made allowances for a variety of different formats to be recognised as ‘signatures’, including Xs, thumbprints and other markings that explicitly demonstrate intent and consent. Common Law implies that a document must have the name or mark of the person signing; the person signing must have applied it themselves; and, the person signing must have intended to sign the document. This paves the way for electronic signatures to be recognised as legally binding and enforceable,” says Luyt.
The ECT Act specifically makes allowances for the legality of electronic signatures, and in fact the Supreme Court recently recognised an email signature as a valid electronic signature. This is because it meets the two most important criteria: there is an association or relationship between the document and the signature; and the person intended it to be a signature.
The majority of documents signed in South Africa do not legally require a signature – this is more of a custom and process requirement to verify that parties are who they say they are. An electronic signature is capable of fulfilling these requirements perhaps better than paper-based solutions, as the electronic signature process creates a tamper-evident audit trail that clearly identifies any areas of risk or suspicion. However, there are also certain transactions that require an advanced electronic signature in order to be legally enforceable, including suretyships, for example. If signed electronically, these need to make use of a specific certification authority endorsed by the South African Department of Communications and other authentication methods.

Selecting an electronic signature solution

Explains Rose, “The ECT Act recognises a variety of digital formats as an ‘electronic signature’, as long as they comply with the criteria of intention and relationship to the document. When looking for a legally compliant electronic signature solution, organisations should select a strong brand with a good reputation in the market. This is essential to ensure that both users and customers will trust that the signatures delivered by the solution are valid.
“Organisations should also feel confident that their provider follows industry best practices. Furthermore, electronic signature solutions are often delivered as a cloud-based service, meaning the provider is tasked with handling and managing part of an organisation’s data. The service provider therefore needs to comply with legislation such as the Protection of Personal Information (POPI) Act and ensure reasonable security and limited processing of sensitive personal information.”
In addition, organisations need to choose a solution that will deliver the desired benefits such as improved efficiency and cost savings. To that end, the solution should work with commonly used applications and file types, as well as existing content management and workflow practices. These should also fit the requirements of the enterprise, including business processes, management and authentication, and signature validation.

Copyright © Insurance Times and Investments® Vol:28.8 1st August, 2015
1710 views, page last viewed on September 19, 2019